Cardiopulmonary exercise testing excludes significant disease in patients recovering from COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: Post-COVID-19 syndrome presents a health and economic challenge affecting ~10% of patients recovering from COVID-19. Accurate assessment of patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome is complicated by health anxiety and coincident symptomatic autonomic dysfunction. We sought to determine whether either symptoms or objective cardiopulmonary exercise testing could predict clinically significant findings. METHODS: 113 consecutive military patients were assessed in a comprehensive clinical pathway. This included symptom reporting, history, examination, spirometry, echocardiography and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in all, with chest CT, dual-energy CT pulmonary angiography and cardiac MRI where indicated. Symptoms, CPET findings and presence/absence of significant pathology were reviewed. Data were analysed to identify diagnostic strategies that may be used to exclude significant disease. RESULTS: 7/113 (6%) patients had clinically significant disease adjudicated by cardiothoracic multidisciplinary team (MDT). These patients had reduced fitness (V̇O2 26.7 (±5.1) vs 34.6 (±7.0) mL/kg/min; p=0.002) and functional capacity (peak power 200 (±36) vs 247 (±55) W; p=0.026) compared with those without significant disease. Simple CPET criteria (oxygen uptake (V̇O2) >100% predicted and minute ventilation (VE)/carbon dioxide elimination (V̇CO2) slope <30.0 or VE/V̇CO2 slope <35.0 in isolation) excluded significant disease with sensitivity and specificity of 86% and 83%, respectively (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.89). The addition of capillary blood gases to estimate alveolar-arterial gradient improved diagnostic performance to 100% sensitivity and 78% specificity (AUC 0.92). Symptoms and spirometry did not discriminate significant disease. CONCLUSIONS: In a population recovering from SARS-CoV-2, there is reassuringly little organ pathology. CPET and functional capacity testing, but not reported symptoms, permit the exclusion of clinically significant disease.

Prior sars-cov-2 infection is associated with subclinical changes in the cardiovascular morphology, function, energetics and exercise capacity

Background: COVID-19 has documented multisystem effects. Whether clinically significant cardiac involvement is related to severity of disease in a working age military population remains unknown, but has implications for occupational grading and ability to deploy. Aims: To determine in the military population 1) whether prior SARS-CoV-2 infection causes clinically significant cardiac disease and 2) whether changes are related to disease severity. Methods: 105 military personnel were recruited, 85 with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection (39±10 years, 87% male;50 mild (community), 35 severe (hospitalized) and 20 healthy volunteers (mean age 39 ±8.4 years, 90% male) underwent comprehensive cardiopulmonary investigations including;cardiopulmonary exercise test, exercise echocardiography, cardiac31MRI and P-MR spectroscopy (rest and dobutamine stress). Results: Prior SARS-CoV-2 infection was related to lower VO2max (110±18.2 vs 133±6.7% predicted, p<0.05), anaerobic threshold (45±10 vs 56±14% of peak VO2, p<0.05), VO2/HR (102±21 vs 128±24% predicted, p<0.05) and VE/VCO2 slope (28.3±5.0 vs 25.8±2.7, p<0.05) and an increase in average E/e' change from rest to exercise stress (+1.49±2.4 vs-0.16±3.6, p<0.05). Whilst resting myocardial energetics were similar, prior SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with a fall in PCr/ATP during stress (by 8%, p=<0.01) which was not seen in healthy controls. When groups were ordered normal> mild> severe disease, RVEDVi, RV stroke volume, VO2peak, VO2pulse and VE/VCO slope were reduced (Jonckheere-Terpstra, all p<0.05). Conclusion: In a young military population, prior SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with subclinical cardiovascular changes including;lower right ventricular volumes, reduced markers of exercise capacity and reduced myocardial energetics during stress.